Skip to Main Content
logo
Scientists in lab coats working in a laboratory with various equipment and tools on the tables.Scientists in lab coats working in a laboratory with various equipment and tools on the tables.

How we lead PFAS R&D

CDM Smith's industry leading PFAS solutions begin in the lab, where rigorous testing at the bench-scale leads to the next generation of treatment and destruction.

Research areas

Blue circle with white faucet and water droplet icon

Drinking water/groundwater treatment

Our Bellevue Research and Testing Laboratory is fully equipped to customize PFAS treata­bil­ity studies and is actively leading state-of-the-art research and pre-design studies. It is uniquely managed by water treatment process and envi­ron­men­tal remediation experts. The synergy of crossing water and envi­ron­men­tal practices allows us to identify treatment options and expand our under­stand­ing of this complex group of chemicals.

Icon of plant sprouting from soil inside blue circle.

Landfills, wastewater and biosolids

CDM Smith and several research partners released a report called, “Cost Analysis of the Impacts on Municipal Utilities and Biosolids Management to Address PFAS Contamination.” The forecast was stark, projecting a 37% increase in overall costs required to address PFAS.

It is now understood that traditional wastewater treatment and biosolids stabilization processes do not effectively degrade PFAS. That presents a clear problem for utilities that process biosolids for beneficial use. Water Resource Recovery Facilities (WRRFs) have become fertile grounds for PFAS research, due to the important role they play in safeguarding surrounding waterways from contamination.

For the latest scientific findings on PFAS and its affects on wastewater treatment plants, look no further than our collaboration with the Water Research Foundation (WRF).

Fire sprinkler icon in white on blue circle background.

Fluorinated firefighting foams

Fluorinated firefighting foams, like aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs), have been identified as a major cause of PFAS contamination. “The problem is decontamination and system compatibility,” says Jill Greene, senior geologist at CDM Smith. There is currently no standard practice for effectively removing PFAS compounds from pumps, tanks, trucks and hangar fire suppression systems. 

Water reuse icon with recycling arrows, blue background.

Water reuse

PFAS are not destroyed through conventional wastewater treatment. They are either discharged through an effluent outfall or partition into biosolids. Furthermore, these outfalls typically have considerable precursor compounds.

Magnifying glass over soil layers, blue circle background.

Fate and transport

By understanding PFAS distribution, migration and transformation in different environments, we can more accurately predict concentrations based on the sources of PFAS released and environmental conditions. Once we understand how PFAS are distributed in the environment, we need to know how PFAS are migrating from sources to environmental and human receptors in the soil, sediment, air and groundwater.

CDM Smith is on the forefront of understanding how the unique properties of PFAS affect their movement. Our research informs conceptual site models, which in turn inform our understanding of environmental and health risks, selection of remedial technologies and our approach to cost-effective remedial design.  

White microscope icon on blue circle background.

Chemical analysis

PFAS data accuracy is vital for risk assessment and decision making. To that end, we are developing new sampling and analysis methods with the U.S. Department of War and other research partners to improve conceptual site models.

Our research is advancing means and methods for sampling different media, like surface water, without bias, to ensure samples are repre­sen­ta­tive, accurate, and account for different chemical backgrounds. Addi­tion­ally, we are looking to understand if specific rapid assessment tech­nolo­gies can identify PFAS source toxicities, especially those impacted by aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF). Rapid assessment can help develop more cost-effective quan­ti­ta­tive sampling and analysis programs.

Inside Bellevue

with CDM Smith environmental scientist Jennifer Hooper 

Video thumbnail

More resources on this topic

Sea waves washing foamy water onto a rocky shoreline.
Insight

Using foam fractionation to treat PFAS

PFAS foam may re-concentrate after being released in the environment, and during processes like wastewater treatment, raising the possibility of a new treatment solution.
Landfill with heavy machinery and birds above, near a pond surrounded by tall grasses.
Insight

EPA proposes addition of nine PFAS to RCRA

EPA proposed the addition of nine PFAS compounds to the list of “hazardous constituents” to be considered in Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facility assessments.
A gloved hand places a vial in a laboratory sample tray with numbered slots.
Insight

PFAS fingerprinting and the case for source control

Source control and pretreatment are among the most cost-efficient ways to fight PFAS. Our researchers are finding new, more efficient ways to identify and trace PFAS fingerprints in the environment.
Glowing digital envelopes on a dark background, symbolizing email communication.

Sign up for PFAS updates

Subscribe to our Breaking Down PFAS newsletter to get your fill of breaking news and dispatches from the front lines of active treatment and R&D projects.