Skip to Main Content
logo
Person in gloves handling a test tube, laboratory equipment visible.Person in gloves handling a test tube, laboratory equipment visible.

Complying with PFAS MCLs

One year after the release of EPA's first PFAS MCLs, the agency proposed several changes, primarily focused on the compliance timeline.

The maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a handful of PFAS, represent the U.S. Government’s first enforceable regulatory action to address these chemical compounds. Environmental scientists expect large volumes of surface and groundwater used to supply drinking water across the U.S. will require PFAS treatment and removal to comply with the lower threshold concentrations. In their Consumer Confidence Reports (CCRs), community water systems will be required to include the level of the regulated PFAS measured in their drinking water, as well as the potential health effects of the regulated PFAS detected in violation of the rule.

One year after the release of EPA's first PFAS MCLs, the agency proposed several changes, primarily focused on the compliance timeline and the additional analytes (PFHxS, PFNA, GenX). 

 

Infographic titled "Breaking PFAS Update: 4 Key Takeaways from EPA’s Proposed PFAS Regulatory Changes" with four numbered points.

 

EPA also acknowledged that water systems are not the polluters of PFAS as passive receivers and intends to establish a federal exemption framework, as well as the new PFAS OUTreach Initiative that will include outreach tools.

“Paired with effluent limitations guidelines (ELGs) for PFAS and other tools to ensure that polluters are held responsible, EPA’s actions are designed to reduce the burden on drinking water systems and the cost of water bills,” reads the news release.

EPA plans to issue a proposed rule this fall that will extend the compliance deadline and finalize this rule in the Spring of 2026. The details of how these proposed changes may impact the initial and compliance monitoring requirements and associated public notification deadlines are not known.

“The extension of EPA’s compliance deadline will be helpful, especially considering the 4 ppt limit that remains for PFOA and PFOS,” said CDM Smith Drinking Water Practice Leader Mark White. “Still, water utilities will need to move swiftly on PFAS treatment in order to meet these standards.”

 

More resources on this topic

Sea waves washing foamy water onto a rocky shoreline.
Insight

Using foam fractionation to treat PFAS

PFAS foam may re-concentrate after being released in the environment, and during processes like wastewater treatment, raising the possibility of a new treatment solution.
Landfill with heavy machinery and birds above, near a pond surrounded by tall grasses.
Insight

EPA proposes addition of nine PFAS to RCRA

EPA proposed the addition of nine PFAS compounds to the list of “hazardous constituents” to be considered in Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facility assessments.
A gloved hand places a vial in a laboratory sample tray with numbered slots.
Insight

PFAS fingerprinting and the case for source control

Source control and pretreatment are among the most cost-efficient ways to fight PFAS. Our researchers are finding new, more efficient ways to identify and trace PFAS fingerprints in the environment.
Glowing digital envelopes on a dark background, symbolizing email communication.

Sign up for PFAS updates

Subscribe to our Breaking Down PFAS newsletter to get your fill of breaking news and dispatches from the front lines of active treatment and R&D projects.