PFAS biosolids research fills critical data gaps

CDM Smith and several research partners (Water Environment Foundation, National Association of Clean Water Agencies and the North East Biosolids and Residual Association) released a report called, “Cost Analysis of the Impacts on Municipal Utilities and Biosolids Management to Address PFAS Cont­a­m­i­na­tion.” The lead author, CDM Smith envi­ron­men­tal engineer Eric Spargimino, analyzed data collected from dozens of facilities throughout the nation. The forecast was stark, projecting a 37% increase in overall costs required to address PFAS. 

“The fact is that water and wastewater utilities are the receivers of PFAS,” Spargimino said at the time. “Regulation will continue to signif­i­cantly disrupt markets if these utilities and other receivers of PFAS aren’t provided treatment options and funding for PFAS mitigation, and the tools needed to identify and control upstream sources of PFAS.” 

We now know traditional wastewater treatment and biosolids stabi­liza­tion processes do not effectively degrade PFAS. That presents a clear problem for utilities that process these materials for beneficial use. For years, researchers have been trying to identify the extent to which potentially harmful PFAS are leaching into water supplies via land-applied biosolids.  As part of an unprece­dented series of sampling and inves­tiga­tive efforts led by the Water Research Foundation (WRF) and CDM Smith, our researchers have been collecting and char­ac­ter­iz­ing data from wastewater utilities across the U.S. With these new PFAS profiles, our scientists and engineers have been able to better understand what factors influence PFAS parti­tion­ing between biosolids and water. 

WRF project 5042 aims to understand how PFAS parti­tion­ing changes as biosolids are biolog­i­cally weathered. Led by Dr. Charles Schaefer, principal inves­ti­ga­tor of the study and Director of the CDM Smith Research and Testing Laboratory in Bellevue, WA, the project started in 2019 and has already confirmed what many in the field of PFAS fate and transport have suspected for a long time: PFAS are leaching from field-deployed biosolids. But Schaefer and his team also discovered that the leaching process is more complicated, especially in light of our improved under­stand­ing of PFAS precursors. 

WRF 5042 reviews real world data collected via case studies and will provide utilities with practical, imple­mentable guidance  on PFAS source evaluation and cost-effective mitigation. Information gained from this study is critical for regulators and utilities to develop the ability to implement the right treatment goals and assess overall PFAS removal. 

WRF 5031, is quantifying a wide range of PFAS within WRRFs in the aqueous, solid and gaseous phases. Upon completion of the project, our researchers will provide definitive guidance on process-based strategies to attenuate the mass flow of PFAS from WRRFs to the environment.  

And stay tuned for coverage of the third leg of this multi-pronged PFAS char­ac­ter­i­za­tion effort—WRF 5082—in which researchers look at the other end of the PFAS lifecycle to develop prevention and mitigation strategies to help keep PFAS out of wastewater utilities.