How do environmental crises shape sustainable water management strategies?

As we anticipate longer and more frequent droughts, oppor­tu­ni­ties like strong atmospheric rivers become crucial. To effectively harness these intense weather events, we must develop faster methods of water storage and improve strategies for groundwater recharge during these periods of high-water intensity.

One Water means looking at the entire water cycle, both the actual natural cycle and the man-made cycle in terms of infra­struc­ture. It examines water, wastewater and stormwater as a more inter­con­nected system. And by doing that, we uncover a lot more oppor­tu­ni­ties.  Histor­i­cally, these systems have been managed in silos. But by breaking down some of these barriers, and having these different agencies work together, we can uncover different ways to optimize that system. Many states are moving forward with indirect or direct potable reuse that allows purified wastewater to be used as a drinking water source. In addition, One Water's premise is to take more of a watershed approach and bring in multiple partners, NGOs, state regulators and other stake­hold­ers.  

The first step is to assess future needs through scenario planning. Scenario planning helps us project future water demands and challenges. We use these projections to establish what infra­struc­ture and tech­nolo­gies will be necessary to meet future water needs effectively. We evaluate the "no project alternative", which quantifies the impacts and costs of potential water shortages. This assessment includes determining the economic losses to commercial and industrial activities due to unreliable water supply using technology. Another method involves contingent valuation surveys with residential customers. These surveys gauge how much households would be willing to pay to avoid water shortages, helping us assign monetary value to quality-of-life impacts. We quantify these impacts on a per-unit basis and compare them with the costs of alternative water supply options. In some cases, such as in California, we've found that even tech­nolo­gies like desali­na­tion can be more cost-effective than the economic impacts of unreliable water supply. This economic evaluation is crucial for utilities to justify and prioritize water infra­struc­ture projects. It helps garner public support necessary for funding through mechanisms like rate increases or securing grants to fund improve­ments needed to ensure a reliable water supply in the future.

Austin, Texas is a prime example of applying the One Water approach effectively. They engaged stake­hold­ers by forming a mayor and City Council-appointed steering committee, which oversaw the consultant selection and project imple­men­ta­tion. Austin also prioritized extensive public outreach through workshops, ensuring broad community involvement and support for planning recom­men­da­tions. Moreover, Austin's proactive approach included assessing various climate change scenarios and modeling future water needs. They embraced adaptive management, contin­u­ously refining projects based on real-world outcomes, now advancing into the third iteration of their planning process.

When starting a One Water plan, ensure a comprehensive assessment of your needs and be prepared to defend your approach. Additionally, engage stakeholders actively and persistently, regardless of their initial reactions in the early stages. Our project experiences show that meaningful stakeholder involvement leads to successful project implementation.