Green infrastructure guidelines for corridor projects

Guideline #1: Develop design standards 

Having a group of standard design details and spec­i­fi­ca­tions will help to save consid­er­able planning and design costs, and make construc­tion easier over time as contractors become familiar with and understand the designs. In addition, these design standards and procedures help make leaders and stake­hold­ers feel confident that green infra­struc­ture practices are being planned and constructed properly.  

Guideline #2: Utilize asset management tools to track success

As one of the first steps in building a best-in-class green infra­struc­ture program, cities should identify a system for quantifying, tracking and monitoring program benefits. A number of illus­tra­tive, interactive tools have been developed; many include mapping components to help monitor program benefits such as water quality improve­ments or tree canopy coverage changes. Others include regulatory calculators so cities can estimate compliance on projects with multiple types of green infra­struc­ture instal­la­tions.

New York City Department of Envi­ron­men­tal Protection (NYCDEP) and CDM Smith, for example, developed a dashboard and asset management system called GreenHUB to track the progress of green infra­struc­ture construc­tion, as well as to provide a digital ‘file cabinet’ for storing design drawings, reports and other submittals over the life of each asset. The system includes an interactive map to help keep the community engaged and show them what is happening in their neigh­bor­hoods.

Guideline #3: Access available funding  

There is a wide variety of funding methods that can be used for green infra­struc­ture programs. Here is a look at how some major cities are funding their assets:

• Water and sewer rates: San Francisco*, New York City and Toronto  (*San Francisco divided sewer charge into a sewer charge and a stormwater charge, but total charge did not change)
• Parcel tax: Los Angeles  
• Stormwater utilities: Detroit, Philadel­phia, Columbus, Cleveland and Harrisburg
• Grants and incentives: Milwaukee, New York City, Philadel­phia and Houston  

Guideline #4: Design with maintenance in mind  

Lessons learned in the green infra­struc­ture design process, says Roach, are "that not everyone wants a right-of-way bioswale in front of their house, porous pavement can be beautiful too, and hardscapes are easier to maintain because they are less susceptible to trash accu­mu­la­tion than rain gardens and bioswales." If vegetated systems are preferred over hardscapes, grasses provide better stormwater infil­tra­tion than plants based on a University of New Hampshire Stormwater Center study. Grasses are also easier to maintain than plants; they can be mowed, and there is a variety of ornamental grasses that are aesthet­i­cally pleasing.

Green infra­struc­ture programs across the country are also addressing maintenance in a variety of ways. Cities like San Francisco have created youth programs that offer oppor­tu­ni­ties for students at local high schools and elementary schools to reha­bil­i­tate green infra­struc­ture sites and help with general maintenance. Philadel­phia created Soak It Up Adoption Mini-Grants, given to orga­ni­za­tions to help maintain neigh­bor­hood green infrastructure. To give them time to get a maintenance division up and running, New Orleans has been including three years of maintenance in green infra­struc­ture construc­tion contracts.

Guideline #5: Foster community engagement  

Community input and active involvement from local residents, businesses, district leaders and artisans promote acceptance, integration and ownership, explains Roach.  

Nicholas Watkins, landscape architect at CDM Smith, highlights the importance of community engagement: "Done right, green infra­struc­ture sites should not serve only as stand-alone free spaces, fenced off, and utilitarian in nature. They should be designed as restorative inter­ven­tions into blighted communities, prior­i­tiz­ing aesthetics, community-specific amenities, and passive recreation space. Rather than taking the space to fix issues downstream, they give space back.”

Take, for example, the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (NEORSD), that included the work of local Cleveland artists in its Union Buckeye project. Poetry was inscribed in plaza seating areas surrounded by rain gardens (and located above subsurface storage systems), with custom-fabricated trench drains, a water tower sculpture and a bike rack symbolizing the water treatment practices within and under the plaza. This community engagement helped to beautify a previously downtrodden area while also spreading the word about the importance of water quality.

Guideline #6: Branding = buy-in 

Program branding helps garner both internal and community-wide support. Cities have used program-specific logos, promotional videos, native-language speaking brochures, interactive maps, and other program materials to familiarize the public and keep stake­hold­ers abreast of the program’s progress and success.  

As Roach reminds clients, "we recognize that one size certainly does not fit all with regard to imple­men­ta­tion. That’s why our approach is tailored to the specific needs of each urban community, as well as the regulatory require­ments, zoning, rainfall patterns, soil types, groundwater elevations, topography and public interests of each project area."